Loading...
Interim National Reports on the Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol (NR)
  |  
| 
last updated: 07 Dec 2017


No country selected.
Interim national report on the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol
CHM-NFP-LA-209804-1 ABS National Focal Point H.E. Mr. Sourioudong Sundara This document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.
To view the current National Focal Point information, click here.
    Yes
    Yes
    There are several difficulties and challenges in setting up the ABS legislation including diverse stakeholders which some of them have their systems already in place; limited of awareness and knowledge; and the official legislative procedures. First, there is a number of stakeholders/sectors involving in the NP implementation such as agriculture, forestry, environment, health, academic and biotechnology that take times to receive consensus. Second, many stakeholders are unaware that access and benefit sharing system is existing and they are not sure how could be implanted to meet the needs of the Nagoya Protocol. For example, Memorandum of Understanding/Memorandum of Agreement or project agreements commonly apply for biological resource cooperation projects between providers and users with provisions of sharing benefit from genetic resources. Basically, the existing procedures for collecting biological resources is to have official permission from providers or the host institutes that indicate purposes, activities, benefits, users, range of collecting duration and other concerned information. Third, establishing a specific ABS regulation is considered to be a better choice for the country to avoid complicated issue of diverse interests and lack of harmonization with existed related legislations. In terms of supporting the specific ABS legislation establishment, Traditional Knowledge and Access to and Benefit Sharing of Genetic Resources has addressed in Article 22 and Article 24 of Biotechnology Safety Law (2014). These two articles are extended to draft the ABS Decree recently together with the ABS framework (2013) implementation. However, the legislative process in the country includes several consultations/public hearings with concerned stakeholders. The involved stakeholders for adopting and supporting the decree is to increase legal certainty and applicable measure to meet the needs of relevant sectors. Moreover, the implementable instrument is another concern to meet demands of research and development and benefit sharing of genetic resource utilization. Compliance mechanism is also considered as a major challenge for tracking and monitoring perspectives.  
    Yes
    Ministry of Science and Technology has appointed by the Lao government to be the national focol point after the NP ratification in 2012. Overall, it seems there was no problem to identify who should be the NP-NFP, but the official nomination might be a challenge due to a long nomination procedure. The NFP assistants is currently in the process of endorsement by the NFP to SCBD for assisting in the NP implementation and coordination.  
    Yes
    Effective coordination mechanism might be a challenge dealing with more than one national competent authorities. 
    Chapter III: ABS administrative system is a key content which is addressed in the Lao ABS Framework (2013). Ministry of Science and Technology with duties and functions is designated to play the role of ABS National Competent Authority in the national framework on ABS that were approved by concerned stakeholders. However, the country is in the process of drafting the ABS Decree that the National Competent Authority should be clearly identified and adopted for referring officially. The official NCA will then submit to the ABS Clearing House after entering into force of the ABS legislation.
    No selection made
    No
    There is a major challenge dealing with prior informed consent for NP implementation. While the country is currently developing the specific ABS decree, there are access requirements from individuals and organizations internationally to NFP. This is an urgent task that should be created in order to facilitate the requests. National registration and ABS permit are applied temporarily based on existing system and regulations.  
    Contracts and/or agreements, for example, MOA, MTA, and MOU are applying into the utilization of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources that lay down the terms and conditions for the research activities. Based on the NP provision, the agreements might be seen as prior informed consent equivalents and use for permission as well mutually agreed terms.
    Not applicable, since no access requirements are in place
    No
    Please see the answer in question 7 above
    No
    Administrative system on ABS has been addressed in the Lao ABS framework under Chapter III. Identify checkpoints will also include in the ABS decree for monitoring and enhancing transparency about the utilization of genetic resource. Additionally to custom, Lao PDR has border physical checkpoints under Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry that plays a significant role on control and prevention including the requirements of users of genetic resources to provide related information and transfer material permission from concerned authorities.
    No additional information provided
    No
    Refer to what Nagoya Protocol has defined the requirements of prior informed consent before accessing to genetic resources, national registration and ABS permit are currently applied temporarily based on existing system and regulations for implementing the protocol as a party (see also answer question 7 above). Or the users can follow existing permission which is highlighted in the following paragraphs. The country is in the process of making a specific ABS regulation for having a single window in the aspect of access to genetic resources. It might call entering permission or informing letter which is commonly used nationwide by concerned sectors such as government agencies, research institutes, and universities as the prior inform consent system. In terms of scientific research projects, the government agencies have used official permission to facilitate and refer to when having exchange of genetic materials such as agricultural crops. Transfer material agreement has applied within several sectors such as research institutes and academic projects depending on the agreements, needs and obligations. In relation to medicinal resources, there is a list of Medical Natural Resources controlled by Research Institute of Traditional Medicinal, Ministry of Health that the requirements of permission need to be done before access to the pharmaceutical resources under Pharmaceutical Natural Resource No. 155/PM, dated 30th September 2003 and the Instruction on the Implementation of Decree on Medical Natural Resources No. 252/MoH, 2007. For genetic resources are under agriculture sector, there is the Minister Declaration on Management and Agricultural Plant Utilization, ref 3919/DA, dated 12 December 2012 which is indicated the exchange crops for R&D, production and commercialization need to ask permission from Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. For example: for exchange crops activities should apply for (1) Phyto Sanitary Certificate; (2) Material Transfer Agreement (MTA); and (3) Import or Export Permission. In addition, Lao PDR is a party of IGPRFA, so STMA is applied for the resource exchanges. In Wildlife and Aquatic Law (2007), Article 35: Permission to operate Business from Wildlife and Aquatic. Individuals and organizations intend to operate businesses from wildlife and aquatic are required an approval from the agriculture and forestry sector and are required to register such enterprise as prescribed in the enterprise law and other related laws and are required to practice as following: (1) Use of wildlife and aquatic in the prohibition category list require the permission from the government; (2) Use of wildlife and aquatic in the management category list require the permission from MAF; (3) Use of wildlife and aquatic from the common or general category list requires the permission from provincial and capital city agriculture and forestry divisions.
    Not applicable
    Not applicable
    Not applicable
    Not applicable
    Not applicable
    Not applicable
      Yes
        Yes
        Training, scientific and information exchange, equipment and publications
      Yes
        Yes
        Training, scientific and information exchange and publications
    A number of individuals and organizations in both domestically and internationally have increased to seek ABS information after entering into force of the protocol (can also see the answer in question 7 above). This can be seen by seeking the ABS consultation on material transfer agreements especially in fauna and flora from related projects within the country. Legal instruments, procedures (PIC&MAT) and how to receive access permit are common questions asking from foreign individuals and organizations. The utilization of genetic resource allows local livelihood benefits (income and jobs) for rural population and traditional users by ethical Bio-trade principles and ABS schemes.
    No additional information provided
    Functional ABS system is a complex aspect of obtaining access to genetic resource. A challenge is identified while in the process of establishing a functional system on ABS on the basic of clear obligations on GR users especially private sectors for confidential information and tracking mechanism. Another difficulty is to understand terms of GR due to relevant to several government agencies and communities including fauna, flora and microorganism. One example might be foreseen with regard to the interaction between communities protocols and culture practice in the one hand, and legal instruments on the other hand. Additionally, special consideration is also concerned that should be required in both legal and institutional arrangements in relation to access and utilization of GR for food and agriculture.
    Yes
    Government policy and administrative system are determined in the National Framework on the Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing Benefit Arising from their Utilization. Benefit sharing mechanism is highlighted with monetary and non-monetary benefits are also included as examples in the framework. The country now is in the process of drafting the ABS Decree which are extended from Article 22 and Article 24 on Traditional Knowledge and Access to and Benefit sharing of GR respectively under Biotechnology Safety Law (2014). In the Article 22 provision is highlighted the use of resources consistent with environmental conditions, conservation, and the sustainable use of genetic resource, and shall share benefits equally and legitimately, as well as being able to access the transfer of relevant biotechnology appropriately.
    Yes
    The National ABS Framework (2013) provides comprehensive guidelines on traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources held by indigenous and local communities is accessed with the prior and informed consent or approval and involvement of them.
    Yes
    Generally, there is an existing procedure of permitting system that are concerned with traditional knowledge or traditional medicine. Local communities are included and invited to participate in related activities; e.g. medicinal process that we include them in the survey; head of village usually tasked to call other members of communities to join the activities. Moreover, licensing/permitting system for the use of natural resources at the level of provinces/prefectures are also existing. In addition, Drug and Medical Product Law (2011) covers traditional medicine that registrations for both imported products and local traditional medicine are requested for applying the permission from Department of Food and Drug, Ministry of Health. Under the National ABS Framework (2013) the benefits sharing from the utilization of traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources are also shared in a fair and equitable way with indigenous and local communities holding such knowledge and that such sharing should be upon mutually agreed terms. Specific provision on Traditional Knowledge is highlighted in Chapter I of Government ABS policy under 1.2.6.
    No additional information provided
    A difficulty identified is to deal with sharing benefit arising from the use of the traditional knowledge. It should be a great support provided by the SCBD secretariat to build the capacity for the parties and share more on this topic and experience. Establish traditional knowledge data base should be done in the written form to use as the reference and should get along well with IP aspect.
    No
      No selection made
      No selection made
    Laos is in the process of developing the ABS Decree which will cover the provisions.
    No
      No selection made
      No selection made
    Laos is in the process of developing the ABS Decree which will cover the provisions. See the answer of question 22 above for how local indigenous and local communities are included in the genetic resource activities.
    No selection made
      No selection made
    The ABS Decree will include the national designated checkpoints for receiving relevant information for prior inform agreement before or during the mutually agreed terms with domestic partners under the Nagoya Protocol. Relevant information is requested by providers from users of genetic resources prior to the Nagoya Protocol. While we are waiting for the official procedure based on the specific ABS regulation, the National Contact Point plays therefore this role today to request related information from users to facilitate as a domestic registration of access to genetic resources. See also answer in question 7 for more detail on the national access registration and ABS permit. Transfer Material Agreement is applied for research and development in the area of biological resource in case of exchange materials are agreed among the parties together with certificates of the origin. There’s an existing checkpoints of Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for physical checkpoints under Law on Plan Protection and Quarantine (Amended) No 15/NA, dated 15 November 2017.
    No
      Not selected
    There is only R&D projects ongoing cooperation so far, this information therefore does not available.
    Yes
    Although the specific ABS regulation is not yet officially adopted in the country, users and providers are already covered in existing MOA; e.g. when we have cooperation agreement; we have steering committee; there is a reporting system in place, usually at six-month intervals.
    Yes
    Cost effective and implementable regulation is our aim to work on the ABS Decree which will also include communication gateways. Basic communication is based on electronically.
    No additional information provided
    Monitoring and tracking tools for the genetic resource used seems to be a complicated system especially international context.
    Not applicable, since no access requirements are in place
    Yes
    Dispute resolution is a mandatory clause which must be indicated in all access agreements (e.g. MOU/MOA/project agreements). Mutual consultation and negotiations are encourage between the parties as primary approach.
    Yes
    If disputes cannot be resolved by negotiations between the parties, then Contract Law (2008) will be applied through reconciliation, mediation, arbitration to judicial legal action. The ABSCH should be used also to seek resource in case of disputes arising.
    Yes
    This is mentioned in above question 32 and the specific provision will be included in the ABS Decree.
    No
    No additional information provided
    Yes
    Research and development promotion is prioritized in the 8th Five Year National Socio-economic Development Plan 2016-2025. There are at least specific policy instruments are extended in accordance with relevant provisions of conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity including National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2016-2025; and National Argo-biodiversity Programme and Action Plan II 2015-2025. The special consideration is covered under the Framework on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefit Arising from their Utilization (2013) where create conditions to promote and encourage research which contributes to the conservation and sustainable us of genetic resources through simplified measures on access for non-commercial research purposes, taking into account the need to address a change of intent for such research. In accordance to the relevant genetic resources within the territorial jurisdiction of Lao PDR and more specifically the access of these resources for the following activities: Survey, harvesting and processing of forest products (Forestry Law 2007); Scientific researches in products of wildlife (Wildlife and Aquatic Animal Conservation Law 2007); Processing of agricultural products, scientific and technical processing of seeds, animal species (Agriculture Law 2011); Scientific-research on fisheries (Fisheries Law 2009); Scientific study and research on the development of livestock production (Law on Livestock Production and Veterinary Matters (Amended) No.08/NA dated 11 November 2016; Control plants and plant products in both import and export (Law on Plant Protection and Quarantine (Amended) No. 31/NA dated 15 November 2016. Pharmaceutical genetic resources and exploration of medicinal natural resources (Decree on Natural Resources for Medicines 2007; Law on Drugs and Medical Products 2012); Collection of plant varieties that exists generally and from there is derived certain improvements where they become new plant varieties (IP law 2011); Plant varieties discovered in nature and further developed to become a new plant variety (IP law 2011). The country is in the process of IP Law amendment that traditional knowledge and geography identification will be covered for promoting and conserving specific genetic resources. There is no fees for non-commercial research purposes that apply to scientific study based genetic resource utilization currently. Material Transfer Agreement is required when exchange genetic materials are conducted with agreement among the parties. Lao PDR is in the process of developing the ABS Decree that should be compatible with the existing laws and regulations; and simplified procedures will be highlighted to promote and encourage research.
    Yes
    According to WHO mission report (2017) from the Joint External Evaluation of International Health Regulation (IHR) Core Capacity, Laos has made a strong progress in improving national public health in the area of IHR communication, coordination and advocacy; surveillance, National Laboratory Capacity; and multi-sectoral outbreak response. The country has established a surveillance system to detect acute public health events and has trained rapid response teams that can be quickly deployed to respond to outbreaks.
    Yes
    Yes
    Laos is a party for ITPGRFA that genetic resources for food and agriculture has applied SMTA.
    No additional information provided
    Yes
    Laos does not have indigenous people. There are 49 officially recognized ethnic groups in Laos representing four ethno-linguistic families: Tai-Kadai, Mon-Khmer, Hmong-Mien and Tibeto that can call local communities. They have very different customs, religions and lifestyles which are also diverse of traditional knowledge.
    No
    No selection made
    No selection made
    The local communities are considered as an important aspect to deal with conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources and associated TK. Targeted communities are informed based on local procedures to deal with permitting system of using natural resources.
    No
    See also answers in question 22 and question 38
    No
    Structure management authorities in the country are divided into two levels as central or national and local authorities (the local authorities are a range from provincial, district to village levels). Community permission and involvement therefore are implemented as an official procedure through the heads of villages in order to respect the local communities especially in access to genetic resource and traditional knowledge.
    No
    If the ABS Decree is adopted by the government, it should be posted in the ABSCH and the potential users can also access relevant information on traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources.
    No selection made
      Yes
      Community participation in development projects is one of the Lao government priority in order to support the government policy of poverty reduction. Many government departments and related development agencies are undertaking conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity projects. Local communities play a very significant role in the decision making process, community managed conservation and understand community needs as well as legal aspects. As a result, community protocols are developed and endorsed by the local communities.
      Yes
      Minimum requirements for manually agreed terms to secure benefit sharing from the utilization of traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources will be included in the ABS Decree. While we are waiting for the specific ABS legislation, information relevant to traditional knowledge for genetic resource utilization is required to be provided in the request application form for the national ABS registration and permit.
      Yes
      Model contractual clauses for benefit sharing arising from the utilization of TK associated with GR will be established including the ABS contract. Transfer Material Agreement have been developed and used among stakeholders dealing with genetic resource projects.
    Yes
    Individuals and organizations who are Lao citizens are exempted for non-commercial purposes of the customary use and exchange of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge within the country in order to promote research and knowledge exchange.
    No selection made
    No additional information provided.
    Traditional knowledge is passed by generations to generations, so gathering the knowledge in the database form is a crucial part to work on traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources. Moreover, TK and IP are very close relation which is a challenge for putting measures in place. This issue should be provided more building capacity from SCBD and other concerned development agencies such as UNCTAC.
    Yes
    It has been a growing recognition on the importance of biodiversity conservation and sustainable utilization of genetic resources. The ABS National Policy recognizes the abundance of forest and water resources which cover the entire length of the country. Although is still rich in natural resources, its biodiversity has been negatively impacted by developments including agricultural expansion forest extraction, mining as well as infrastructure and dam construction. Considering this circumstance, we can say that it is time to put more efforts than raise awareness on biodiversity conservation, benefit sharing from the utilization of genetic resources should be in place to provide incentive for both users and providers to conserve the genetic resources. The Nagoya Protocol Ratification is an effort done by the Lao government for meeting demands of conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. The country has established the National Framework that include relevant stakeholders in order to use as a guidance on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the CBD. ABS has then introduced into the country strategies such as biodiversity and agro-biodiversity.
    No answer provided
    This has been addressed in question 45 above. The NP implementation has allowed an integration opportunity to concerned organizations and people working in the area of conservation. It has also facilitated the country in developing relevant implementing instruments. This can be seen in the process of establishment of the national ABS framework, biodiversity strategy and the national agro-biodiversity programes. The NP implementation has illustrated fully respect for genetic resource owners. Communities particularly can participate in the conservation and research project activities which has led to enhance their livelihoods with sustainable use of genetic resources.
    No additional information provided.
    No
    Not applicable, since there are no indigenous and local communities in my country
    No
    No additional information provided
    There is no experience or cases on the matter. However, if there is a case Lao PDR is willing to cooperate with a view to implementing the protocol. It would be great idea if SCBD can build capacity for parties on this particular issue for being a case study eg. internationally, regionally or domestically.
    Yes
    This has been already addressed under question 42 above
    Yes
    The ABS framework is using as the ABS guidance while we are waiting for the ABS Decree. Technical guidelines will be developed for supporting the decree.
    No additional information provided
    Best practices and lesson learn should be shared among the parties by SCBD
    Yes
    Yes
    Mechanisms for Public Education Awareness and Participation has established under Chapter IV of the National ABS Framework (2013). The purpose is to make people aware of biodiversity and has knowledge of fair and equitable sharing benefits from genetic resource utilization, including by appropriate access to GR, and by appropriate transfer of relevant technologies, taking into account rights over the resources and technologies, and by appropriate funding, thereby contributing to conservation and sustainable use of biological resources. Some activities have been conducted on awareness raising. They are (1) reports on the ABS project activities; a set of published awareness raising materials in local language such as ABS Simply Explained video, ABS framework, lessons learned and good practice on ABS implementation, newspaper and magazine. These materials are distributed to concerned stakeholders and universities.
    Yes
    Yes
    The Lao government ratified the Nagoya Protocol in September 2012 and designated the national contact point from Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). The ABS framework was established in 2013 with stakeholder consultations. Building capacity is a key principle that is highlighted in the National ABS Framework 2013. Technical Service and Genetic Resource Divisions were then created in 2015 at Biotechnology and Ecology Institute, MOST to assist the national focal point of Nagoya Protocol based on technical and coordination supports domestically and internationally.
    Yes
    Lao PDR participated in the regional project of Building Capacity for Regionally Harmonized National Processes for Implementing CBD Provisions on Access to genetic Resources and Sharing Benefits from April 2012 to February 2013. The main objective was to help the Lao government to ratify the Nagoya Protocol. The project budget is 33,000 US$ supported by the ACB-UNEP-GEF is 24,000 US$ and the rest is from the government contribution. This project was extended from August to October 2013 with extra funds of 10,000 US$ for develop and publish appropriate awareness materials and conduct awareness raising activities; publish manuscript of national ABS framework; and document and publish lessons learned of good practices on ABS implementation. Lao PDR was included in the regional project of Building Capacity of Countries in Support of the Development and Implementation of National ABS Frameworks. The project was implemented from June 2015 to March 2016 with 22,400 US$ supported by ACB-UNEP China. The project aims to provide technical support for developing ABS framework and regulation. The draft ABS Decree has developed with the support of Division of Environmental Law and Conventions under the UNEP program 4.22.1 Strengthening Institutional Capability of Countries in Environmental Law through Training, Technical Assistance, Sharing Expertise and Legal Guidance Materials. The amount of budget is 10,000 US$ from UNEP and from the government.
    Yes
    Share information, experiences in national ABS framework and awareness raising with other parties.
    No additional information provided
    The country would like to seek support from GEF in order to build capability for implementing the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing. An urgent task now for Lao PDR is to adopt the ABS Decree with approval from all concerned stakeholders and the Prime Minister and other related instrument to implement the NP. Building capacity for relevant bodies is also necessary to operate the system with awareness raising from top management to local communities.
    Yes
    Benefit sharing of the GR utilization is a key principle for Lao policy on conservation and sustainable use. There are cooperating programmes with domestic and internal partners. Land and forest land allocation is currently one of the priority government programs, which is linked to the promotion of sustainable forest management leading by Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and concerned government agencies. As a result, local communities or villagers have become the forest managers when they can have direct benefit from the management. Lao PDR has accessed to the Regional Bio Trade Project Southeast Asia (UNCTAD, HELVETAS-Laos) that main objective is to promote sustainable trade of natural ingredients to conserve biodiversity and develop livelihoods of rural populations. The output of the project will use as a business model in terms of fair and sustainable trade of biological resources. This project will also develop the access and benefit sharing pilot schemes to implement in several farmers/collectors groups, in collaboration with other UNDP support to ABS implementation. Furthermore, JICA-Laos has implemented a pilot project for using technology in adding value to medicinal plants in the country.
    No additional information provided
    Becoming a party to the protocol is not an issue for Lao PDR. This is because of the government commitment in conserving and sustaining its biological resource. There are many difficulties and challenges after becoming the party to implement the protocol including limited finance, resources, experiences and understanding. Although the country has national framework on ABS, it has still not gone to practice. Moreover, there is an urgent need to the country to establish operational mechanism on the ABS due to many contacts from individuals and organizations to our national focal point in accessing country GR. In addition, there is a challenge for domestic coordination and integration that the Convention on Biological Diversity and GEP NFPs are under Ministry of Natural Resource and Environment in Lao PDR while Nagoya Protocol on ABS is under Ministry of Science and Technology. It would be more effective and implementable if funding allocation from SCBD or related donors provides specific for the Nagoya Protocol implementation.
    No
    Generally, there is the state budget allocation for all government agencies annually to work on relevant activities. If additional budget needed should be proposed to Ministry of Planning and Investment for approval. In particular to the Nagoya Protocol, the government so far can only co-finance staff, equipment, building and some domestic transportation. The establishment of ABS fund is necessary and it will allow better implementation of the protocol.
      Yes
Lao PDR has proposed to the GEF 6 allocation fund, but the budget is finished recently and was spent for other projects. There have been also limited calls for funding received by our NFP to implement the NP. One experience might be some development partners within the country such as FAO, IUCN, WWF, UNDP and others do not clearly understand on ABS aspects that can link to their development activities.
UNEP Project on Support to Preparation of the Interim National Report on the Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Lao PDR: 40,000 US$ (UNEP 20,000 US$ and the Lao Government 20,000 US$)- this project is from June 2017 to November 2018.
    Yes

      Less than 5
    No information provided
    The questions in the format covers all provision under the NP. It seems there is no issue regarding the format except for some repetitions in the provided questions and limited space to add information in some pages or questions such as question 11.