Loading...
This record has been deleted. Since it is linked to a published record, it is available here for reference purposes only.
Click here to view the deleted recordThis document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.
Virtual Library Resource
(VLR)
last updated: 19 Aug 2016
Facilitating BioTrade in a Challenging Access and Benefit Sharing Environment
EN
- UN and other specialized agency of the UN Common System
2016-01
EN
Original document
EN
Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint to be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat. Copyright © United Nations, 2016.
EN
- UNCTAD BioTrade Scoping study.pdf [ English ]
- UNCTAD website [ English ]
The relationship between BioTrade1 and ABS continues to challenge policy makers, entrepreneurs, communities, project managers and academics alike.
Since its launching in 1996 under UNCTAD´s “BioTrade Initiative”, BioTrade has demonstrated the importance of multiple forms of conservation and sustainable-use of biodiversity and ecosystems oriented businesses.
The key challenge is to clarify how BioTrade can take into account mandatory ABS principles, in accordance with the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization.
In parallel and often with limited interaction, BioTrade projects, businesses and ABS frameworks, have expanded in many regions and countries. A definite answer to the quintessential question of “do ABS laws or regulations apply to my BioTrade project or business activity” remains elusive. National ABS frameworks are often unclear as to whether certain BioTrade activities are covered under their scope. As a result, legal uncertainty often prevails in regard to clarity of applicable ABS norms and regulations, exclusions, obligations, rights and benefit sharing criteria.
The Nagoya Protocol is the most recent addition to a complex international, regional and national “ABS architecture” which defines how and under what conditions genetic resources and biochemicals can be accessed and utilized – with potential implications on BioTrade.
This scoping study offers an overview of the challenges faced and options available to implement BioTrade and ABS principles under the CBD and the Nagoya Protocol in a coherent manner. It further provides examples of how these challenges are being addressed. The study gives an overview of the current state-of-the-art discussions and issues in order to facilitate a better understanding of how to manage the interphase between BioTrade and ABS in practice.
This scoping study is one output of the BioTrade Facilitation Programme’s third phase (BFPT III), which seeks to “mainstream BioTrade in relevant multilateral, regional and national processes and strengthen the policy and regulatory environment for BioTrade sectors. This will allow key stakeholders (governments and companies) to take advantage of policy options and strategies available for BioTrade sectors”.
EN
- Global
- Aichi-T1. Awareness of biodiversity values
- Aichi-T3. Incentives
- Aichi-T4. Use of natural resources
- Aichi-T16. Nagoya Protocol on ABS
- GBF-T16. Sustainable consumption choices are enabled, and food waste reduced by half
- GBF-T18. Reduce harmful incentives by at least $500 billion per year
- GBF-T15. Businesses assess and disclose biodiversity dependencies, impacts and risks, and reduce negative impacts
- GBF-T13. Fair and equitable sharing of benefits from genetic resources, digital sequence information and associated traditional knowledge
Migrated information
Format: Text document (e.g. adobe acrobat reader or Word)
Format details: PDF format
Civil society organizations
Government officials
National/Federal
Private Sector
Research/Academia
Expertise Level: Advanced
EN
Format: Text document (e.g. adobe acrobat reader or Word)
Format details: PDF format
Target Groups
Civil society organizations
Government officials
National/Federal
Private Sector
Research/Academia
Expertise Level: Advanced
Loading...
