Loading...
Interim National Reports on the Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol (NR)
  |  
| 
last updated: 19 Dec 2017


No country selected.
Swaziland Interim national report on the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol
CHM-NFP-SZ-209728-25 ABS National Focal Point Mr. Emmanuel Dlamini This document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.
To view the current National Focal Point information, click here.
    Yes
    - Limited capacity on the use of the clearing house
    -
    Yes
    - limited understanding about the scope and legal principles of ABS in the context of the Protocol - inadequate financial and technical resources - overlapping mandates in the management and regulation of genetic resources in the country - absence of an overarching framework biodiversity conservation and management legislation  
    The country has developed administrative guidelines to implement ABS
    Yes
     
    Yes
     
    No selection made
    No
     
    No permits issued yet
    Not applicable, since no access requirements are in place
    No
    Yes
    No additional information provided
    Yes
    provided for in the administrative guidelines paragraph 5
    Yes
    paragraph 5 of the administrative guidelines
    Yes
    paragraph 5.2 of the administrative guidelines
    Yes
    provided for in paragraph 5.6 read with annex 2 of the administrative guidelines
    Yes
    paragraph 5.6 read with annex 6 of the administrative guidelines
    0
    Yes
    paragraph 5.5 of the administrative guidelines
    No selection made
    none, since there has not been any access permit issued yet, however paragraph 7 of the administrative guidelines provides for benefit sharing.
    No additional information provided
    There is a need for more capacity building initiatives on negotiation PIC and MAT
    Yes
    Paragraph 7 of the guidelines do provide for issues of equitable sharing of benefits
    Yes
    Paragraph 5.1 and 5.3 provides for protection of rights of local communities .
    Yes
    Paragraph 5.3 provides for access to indigenous knowledge
    No additional information provided
    - There is a need to provide for the definition of indigenous people as per the local context - The implementation of the Protocol is still challenged by clarity on "ownership" of genetic resources hence there is a need to always go through the CNAs. - The absence of a comprehensive legislation instrument on ABS issues.
    Yes
      Yes
      the Guidelines are made under the Environmental Management Act, which has a penal code for non compliance.
      Non-compliance attracts administrative fines and at times criminal sanction
      No
    Yes
      No
      No
      the country is still working on appropriate compliance mechanism
    Yes
      there are various checkpoints provided for in the guidelines
      Yes
    No
      Not selected
    Yes
    paragraph 5.5 of guidelines
    Yes
    paragraph 8 of the guidelines
    No additional information provided
    Not applicable, since no access requirements are in place
    Yes
    paragraph 5.1.3 (15) of the guidelines
    Yes
    paragraph 5.5 (14) of the guidelines
    Yes
    paragraph 5.5 (14) of the guidelines
    Yes
    There are provisions in other country's legislations (Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act of 1922)
    No additional information provided
    Yes
    paragraph 5.6.2 of the guidelines
    No
    No
    Yes
    paragraph 5.6.3
    No additional information provided
    Yes
    The country still has a need to define ILC with respect to the local context
    Yes
    Swaziland Constitution Act 2005
    Yes
    paragraph 5.1 of guidelines
    Yes
    Yes
    paragraph 5.1.4.9 of the guidelines
    Yes
    paragraph 5.3 of the guidelines
    No
    No selection made
      Yes
      paragraph 4.2.1.1 (13)
      Yes
      paragraph 5.5 read with annex 5
      Yes
    Yes
    paragraph 5.6.3 of guidelines
    No selection made
    No additional information provided.
    Traditional Knowledge associated with Genetic resources is still not yet documented. However, the country is committed through the NBSAP2 to undertake this.
    Yes
    paragraph 7 of guidelines
    No answer provided
    The implementation of the Protocol is still at infantry stage in the country.
    No additional information provided.
    Yes
    Not applicable, since there are no indigenous and local communities in my country
    Yes
    No additional information provided
    Yes
    paragraph 5.5 read with annex 5 of guidelines
    Yes
    the development of the national administrative guidelines is in line with the African Union guidelines to implement ABS. Furthermore, the country encourages synergies with other regimes i.e. ITPGRFA
    No additional information provided
    Yes
    Yes
    A national outreach and information strategy has been developed, however its implementation is at its infancy
    Sensitisation workshops have been undertaken for identified key stakeholders i.e. traditional authorities, policy makers, regulators, bio traders,
    Yes
    Yes
    About five people have been capacitated on the measures for the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol
    Yes
    The country has received support from the ABS capacity building initiative, UNEP, The University of Cape Town and the African Union Commission
    No
    No additional information provided
    - More capacity building is still required
    Yes
    - The country has the biotechnology park which has a research and development programme for pharmaceuticals using indigenous plants, collaborating with South Africa
    No additional information provided
    - Limited resources (human, financial, technological) to implement the Protocol's obligations - Challenges in understanding the ABS concept in the context of the Protocol -
    Yes
    - The Swaziland Environment Authority (CNA) is funded by government
    - As a developing country, there is limited financial resources, although there is the government's willingness
      Yes
          Yes
              Yes
              Yes
              Yes
              - GIZ - AU (NEPAD) - RAEIN-Africa (Regional Initiative)
No information provided
US$30 000 from the Nagoya Implementation Fund has been received to support the country's ratification process
    Yes

      One
    - Budgetary constraints - Lack of institutional framework
    - Limited capacity within the existing human resource to fully implement the Protocol
    - The format is user friendly