Loading...
Interim National Reports on the Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol (NR)
  |  
| 
last updated: 21 Feb 2018


No country selected.
Portugal's interim national report on the Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol
- Competent National Authority: | ABSCH-CNA-PT-207431-4
Competent National Authority:
Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas / Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests ()
Avenida da República, 16 a 16B
Lisboa, Lisboa
1050-191 Lisboa, Portugal
Phone: +351 213 507 900,
Fax:
Website: http://www.icnf.pt,
To view the current National Focal Point information, click here.
    Yes
    No relevant difficulties or challenges encountered.
    Yes
    Regulation (EU) 511/2014 on compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation in the Union; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 511/2014 as regards register of collections, monitoring user compliance and best practices; Commission Notice – Guidance document on the scope of application and core obligations of Regulation (EU) 511/2014 (2016/C 313/1) Decree-Law 122/2017 establishing measures for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 511/2014 at the national level.  
    Yes
    No relevant difficulties nor challenges encountered for designating a national focal point  
    Yes
    No relevant difficulties nor challenges were encountered for designating the national competent authority. 
    No. 1 of article 4 of Decree-Law 122/2017, of 21st September (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/108192977/details/maximized ), establishes the Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests as the Portuguese National Competent Authority for the purposes of Regulation (EU) no. 511/2104 and ABS generally. No. 2 of article 4 of Decree-Law 122/2017, of 21st September further determines that the competent bodies of the Autonomous Regions of Azores and Madeira shall designate Competent Regional Authorities. The Institute for Forestry and Nature Conservation, IP-RAM serves as the Competent Regional Authorities in Madeira. As of the date of the submission of the present report the process for the designation of the Competent Regional Authority of the Azores is ongoing.
    No selection made
    No
    In Portugal, access to genetic resources is only regulated in the Authonomous Region of the Azores (see answers 11-17). As of the date of the submission of the present report the process for the designation of the Competent Regional Authority of the Azores is ongoing. Permits issued at the time of access will be submited by the Competent Regional Authority of the Azores once it is formally designated.  
    Not applicable, since no access requirements are in place
    No
    In Portugal, access to genetic resources is only regulated in the Authonomous Region of the Azores (see answers 11-17). As of the date of the submission of the present report the process for the designation of the Competent Regional Authority of the Azores is ongoing. Permits issued at the time of access will be submited by the Competent Regional Authority of the Azores once it is formally designated.
    Yes
    The main challenge in defining the checkpoints in the EU was striking a balance between having effective checkpoints covering the full range of relevant ABS activities, while avoiding creating unnecessary administrative burden.
    Pursuant to Article 7(1) and (2) of Regulation 511/2014 designated competent authorities receive information as provided in Article 17(1) of the Protocol from users within their jurisdiction. In Portugal, the competent national authority designated is: Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests. The Institute for Forestry and Nature Conservation, IP-RAM serves as the Competent Regional Authorities in Madeira. As of the date of the submission of the present report the process for the designation of the Competent Regional Authority of the Azores is ongoing. Checkpoint functions are to be performed either by the competent national authority or by the competent regional authorities on the basis of the geographical location of the submitter (where utilization takes place) More specifically, there are two checkpoints in Portugal, as established at EU level: 1st checkpoint: competent authorities designated under Regulation 511/2014, i.e. on the basis of the geographical location of the submitter, the Competent National Authority or the Competent Regional Authorities receive due diligence declarations from researchers; all recipients of research funding, where such research involves utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, are requested either by the European Commission or by the Member State as providers of funding, to declare that they exercised due diligence; the template for this declaration is contained in the Commission Implementing Regulation in Annex II; 2nd checkpoint: competent authorities designated under Regulation 511/2014, i.e. on the basis of the geographical location of the submitter, the Competent National Authority or the Competent Regional Authorities gather due diligence declarations at the final stage of a product development from all users; the template for this declaration is contained in the Commission Implementing Regulation in Annex III; specific events triggering submission of the declaration are defined in Article 6 of the Commission Implementing Regulation. For both checkpoints, the authorities referred above transfer the information to ABS Clearing House, provided it is not confidential; alternatively, in case crucial information for publishing of checkpoint communiqué (CPC) is indicated as confidential and CPC cannot be published, the authorities contact the competent national authorities of the country providing genetic resources.
    No additional information provided
    Decree-Law 122/2017, of 21st September (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/108192977/details/maximized)
    Yes
    Presently there is no national legislation nor regulatory requirements drawing from the Nagoya Protocol for access to genetic resources neither in mainland Portugal nor in the Autonomous Region of Madeira. In the Autonomous Regions of Azores, Regional Decree-Law 9/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/553632/details/maximized ) and Regional Regulatory Decree 20/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/191518/details/maximized ) establish a legal framework for (i) the access to, the transfer of and the sharing of benefits arising out of the utilization of natural (including genetic) resources. The regime determines that the collection of natural resources for scientific purposes is subject to Prior Informed Consent. Portugal is assessing whether to establish national PIC/MAT requirements for access to genetic resources in light of the Nagoya Protocol.
    Yes
    Chapter II of Regional Decree-Law 9/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/553632/details/maximized ) and Chapter I of Regional Regulatory Decree 20/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/191518/details/maximized ).
    Yes
    http://www.formstack.com/forms/GRA-Request_Access_Sampling_Scientific_Purposes
    Yes
    Chapter II of Regional Decree-Law 9/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/553632/details/maximized ) and Chapter I of Regional Regulatory Decree 20/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/191518/details/maximized ).
    Yes
    Chapter II of Regional Decree-Law 9/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/553632/details/maximized ) and Chapter I of Regional Regulatory Decree 20/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/191518/details/maximized ).
    0
    See answers 7 and 8.
    Yes
    Chapter IV of Regional Decree-Law 9/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/553632/details/maximized ) and Chapter III of Regional Regulatory Decree 20/2012/A (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/191518/details/maximized )
    No selection made
    Yes
    Article 4(1) of EU Regulation 511/2014 provides that “users shall exercise due diligence to ascertain that genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources which they utilise have been accessed in accordance with applicable access and benefit-sharing legislation or regulatory requirements and that benefits are fairly and equitably shared upon mutually agreed terms, in accordance with any applicable legislation or regulatory requirements.”. Article 4(3) of Decree-Law 122/2017, of 21st September further elaborates on this, determining that “Due diligence aims to ensure that… benefits are shared in a fair and equitable way on the basis of mutually agreed terms.”.
    Yes
    Article 4(1) of EU Regulation 511/2014 provides that “users shall exercise due diligence to ascertain that genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources which they utilise have been accessed in accordance with applicable access and benefit-sharing legislation or regulatory requirements and that benefits are fairly and equitably shared upon mutually agreed terms, in accordance with any applicable legislation or regulatory requirements.”. Article 4(3) of Decree-Law 122/2017, of 21st September further elaborates on this, determining that “Due diligence aims to ensure that… benefits are shared in a fair and equitable way on the basis of mutually agreed terms.”.
    Yes
    Article 4(1) of EU Regulation 511/2014 provides that “users shall exercise due diligence to ascertain that genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources which they utilise have been accessed in accordance with applicable access and benefit-sharing legislation or regulatory requirements and that benefits are fairly and equitably shared upon mutually agreed terms, in accordance with any applicable legislation or regulatory requirements.”. Article 4(3) of Decree-Law 122/2017, of 21st September further elaborates on this, determining that “Due diligence aims to ensure that… benefits are shared in a fair and equitable way on the basis of mutually agreed terms.”.
    No additional information provided
    Yes
      Yes
      - Regulation (EU) 511/2014 on compliance measrues for the users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation in the Union; entered into force on 12 October 2014; - Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 511/2014 as regards register of collections, monitoring user compliance and best practices; entered into force on 9 November 2015; - Decree-Law 122/2017 establishing measures for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 511/2014 at the national level, namely the establishment of Competent Authorities and sanctions applicable to infringements to articles 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) 511/2014.
      No
    Yes
      Yes
      No
      The EU ABS Regulation (511/2014) and Commission Implementing Regulation (2015/1866) as well as Decree-Law 122/2017 are applicable to genetic resources and to traditional knowledge associated with the genetic resources; Decree-Law 122/2017 together with the Regulations provide for the legal framework to deal with issues of non-compliance.
    Yes
      In line with Article 7(1) and (2) of Regulation 511/2014, and with article 8 of Decree-Law 122/2017 users need to provide information as required by Article 17(1) of the Protocol to competent authorities designated in Portugal. Annexes II and III to the Commission Implementing Regulation provide for the list of information requested from reserachers and end-users respectively; this includes also information related to PIC, the source of genetic resource, to the establishment of MAT and to utilisation of genetic resoruces.
      Yes
        In addition to the above, competent authorities in Portugal are obliged, based on Article 9 of Regulation 511/2014, to perform checks on user compliance in accordance with a periodically revised risk-based plan.
    No
      Not selected
    No
    Yes
    Article 13 of Regulation 511/2014 obliges the Commission and Member States, as appropriate, to promote the development and use of cost-effective communication tools and systems in support of monitoring and tracking the utilisation of genetic resources and trditional knowledge associated with genetic resources by collections and users. Portugal uses the for EU-wide web-based tool DECLARE which enables users of genetic resources to submit the due diligence declarations required by Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 to the relevant competent authorities. DECLARE is also used to transfer non-confidential information from the due diligence declarations to the ABS Clearing House. Decree-law 122/2017 further promotes the use of cost-effective communication tools, namely by establishing that: • all communications among the members of the Advisory Group on ABS established by article 5 of Decree-law 122/2017 are to be made by electronic means; • all requests for inclusion of collections in the EU register of collections (art. 5 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014) are to be made electronically using the application form and guidance available in the National Competent Authority website (http://www.icnf.pt/portal/pn/biodiversidade/ei/dl-122-2017 ); • all applications for recognition of best practices (art. 8 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014) are to be made electronically using the application form and guidance available in the National Competent Authority website (http://www.icnf.pt/portal/pn/biodiversidade/ei/dl-122-2017 );
    Not applicable, since no access requirements are in place
    Yes
    Yes
    Access to justice, including in cases of contractual disputes, is a constitutional right enshrined in article 20, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic (https://dre.pt/web/guest/legislacao-consolidada/-/lc/34520775/view ) ensuring that no one is hampered or prevented from exercising or defending their rights on the basis of their social, cultural or economic condition. Law no. 34/2004 of 29 July (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/502394/details/maximized ), further develops and materializes the right of access to justice, namely by establishing the regime on access to the law and the courts transposing into national law the Council Directive 2002/8/CE, of 27 January (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32003L0008&from=PT ), to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes.
    Yes
    Although no specific measures were taken within the ABS legal framework, access to justice is a constitutional right enshrined in article 20, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic (https://dre.pt/web/guest/legislacao-consolidada/-/lc/34520775/view ) ensuring that no one is hampered or prevented from exercising or defending their rights on the basis of their social, cultural or economic condition. Law no. 34/2004 of 29 July (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/502394/details/maximized ), further develops and materializes the right access to justice, namely by establishing the regime on access to the law and the courts transposing into national law the Council Directive 2002/8/CE, of 27 January (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32003L0008&from=PT ), to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes.
    Yes
    Although no specific measures were taken within the ABS legal framework, foreign judgments are enforceable ( Article 706 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure https://dre.pt/web/guest/legislacao-consolidada/-/lc/34580575/view?w=2017-06-16 ), although subject to revision and confirmation in the terms established by the Code of Civil Procedure (Articles 978 to 985 of the Code of Civil Procedure https://dre.pt/web/guest/legislacao-consolidada/-/lc/34580575/view?w=2017-06-16. The right to the recognition of foreign judgments, in particular as regards jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, also draws from the Brussels Convention, approved by Resolution of the Assembly of the Republic No. 34/91, of 30 October (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/568539/details/maximized ), and from Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, of 22 December 2000 (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:012:0001:0023:en:PDF ), replacing the Brussels Convention with regard to EU countries.
    No
    Yes
    Article 4(8) of Regulation 511/2014, and Article 7 of Decree-law 122/2017 provide for a short temporal derogation from the duties of its Article 4(3) and 4(5) for users acquiring a genetic resource that is determined to be, or is determined as likely to be, the causing pathogen of a present or imminent public health emergency of international concern.
    Yes
    Yes
    Recital 12 of Regulation 511/2014 recalls Article 8(c) of the Protocol and explains that the ITPGRFA is a specialised instrument within the meaning of Article 4(4) of the Protocol. The Regulation also recognises that where Parties to the Protocol have decided to use the standard material transfer agreement for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture which are not covered by ITPGRFA, but which are under their control and management and in public domain, submission of due diligence declarations is not required. Article 2 “scope“ of Decree-law 122/2017 determines its applicability to users of genetic resources and users of traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources without prejudice to specific applicable legislation, namely Decree-law 118/2002 which established the legal regime on registry, conservation, legal safeguard and transference of autochthonous plant material with actual or potential interest for agriculture, agroforestry and landscape related activities.
    No additional information provided
    No
    Not applicable
    No selection made
    No selection made
    Not applicable
    Not applicable
    Not applicable
    Not applicable
      No selection made
      No selection made
      No selection made
    Not applicable
    Not applicable
    No additional information provided.
    Yes
    In line with Article 13 of Regulation 511/2014, the Commission and the Member States shall encourage users and providers to direct benefits from the utilisation of genetic resources towards the conservation of biological diversity and the sustainable use of its components in accordance with the provisions of the Convention. Article 12 “cooperation and complementary measures“ of Decree-law 122/2017 determines that members of the Advisory Group on ABS (established by article 5 of Decree-law 122/2017) may establish protocols, agreements or other forms of cooperation with entities (e.g. Universities, public laboratories, museums, etc.) utilising genetic resources, among others, (art. 12 e)) in order to encourage users and providers of genetic resources to channel benefits arising out of utilization to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity as provided in Article 9 of the Nagoya Protocol.
    No answer provided
    The implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Portugal is in an initial stage and therefore there is insufficient experience to provide an assessment in this regard.
    No additional information provided.
    No
    Portugal is the initial stage of implementation of the Nagoya Protocol and until the moment of submission of the present report we were not presented with a practical situation raising concerns on the origin of genetic material.
    Not applicable, since there are no indigenous and local communities in my country
    No selection made
    No additional information provided
    Yes
    In line with Article 13 of Regulation 511/2014, the Commission and the Member States shall encourage development of codes of conduct, model contractual clauses, guidelines and best practices, particularly when they would benefit academics, university and non-commercial researchers and small and medium-sized enterprises. Article 12 “cooperation and complementary measures“ of Decree-law 122/2017 determines that members of the Advisory Group on ABS (established by article 5 of Decree-law 122/2017) may establish protocols, agreements or other forms of cooperation with entities (e.g. Universities, public laboratories, museums, etc.) utilising genetic resources, among others, (art.12 b)) in order to develop model contractual clauses as provided in Article 19 of the Nagoya Protocol.
    Yes
    In line with Article 13 of Regulation 511/2014 the Commission and the Member States shall encourage development of sectoral codes of conduct, model contractual clauses, guidelines and best practices, particularly when they would benefit academics, university and non-commercial researchers and small and medium-sized enterprises. Article 12 “cooperation and complementary measures“ of Decree-law 122/2017 determines that members of the Advisory Group on ABS (established by article 5 of Decree-law 122/2017) may establish protocols, agreements or other forms of cooperation with entities (e.g. Universities, public laboratories, museums, etc.) utilising genetic resources, among others, (art.12 b)) in order to develop codes of conduct and best practices as provided in Article 20 of the Nagoya Protocol.
    No additional information provided
    Yes
    No
    Seminar on “Access and Benefit Sharing: Global and EU Frameworks for access to and utilization of genetic resources” 17th February 2016 at the CCMAR (Centre of Marine Sciences of the University of Algarve - https://www.ccmar.ualg.pt/ ). Meeting with the Global Health and Tropical Medicine Institute (http://www.ihmt.unl.pt/ ) of the Nova University of Lisboa 9th june 2017 with the objective of informing and providing clarifications on ABS to people responsible for legal conformity of projects within the University. Following this meeting, a seminar on “The importance of the Nagoya Protocol for users of genetic resources” took place on the 14th November 2017 in the Global Health and Tropical Medicine Institute with the aim of informing the wider researcher community of the University of their rights and obligations under the ABS legal framework. Seminar on "The regime on the utilization of genetic resources - rights and obligations of users" 29th November 2017 in the Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources (https://cibio.up.pt/about ) with the aim of informing the wider researcher community of the University of their rights and obligations under the ABS legal framework. Seminar on "The regime on the utilization of genetic resources - rights and obligations of users" 5th February 2018 in the Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (https://www2.ciimar.up.pt/ ) with the aim of informing the wider researcher community of the University of their rights and obligations under the ABS legal framework.
    No
    No
    No
    No
    No additional information provided
    No
    No additional information provided
    No selection made
      No selection made
No information provided
No information provided
    No selection made

    No information provided
    No information provided